ISO 22392:2020 pdf download

ISO 22392:2020 pdf download.Security and resilience — Community resilience — Guidelines for conducting peer reviews
1 Scope
This document gives guidelines for organizations to design, organize, conduct, receive feedback from and learn from a peer review of their disaster risk reduction (DRR) policies and practices. It is also applicable to other community resilience activities. It is intended for use by organizations with the responsibility for, or involvement in, managing such activities including policy and preparedness, response and recovery operations, and designing preventative measures (e.g. for the effects of environmental changes such as those from climate change). It is applicable to all types, structures and sizes of organizations, such as local, regional and national governments, statutory bodies, non-governmental organizations, businesses, and public and community groups. It is applicable before or after an incident or exercise.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 22300, Security and resilience — Vocabulary
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 22300 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1 peer review
process used by a reviewer (3.3) to examine the performance of a host (3.2), provide feedback on an analysis area (3.4) and learn lessons that are transferable to its own context
Note 1 to entry: A peer review may cover multiple analysis areas.
Note 2 to entry: The host may replace “review” with a synonym such as “assessment”, “appraisal” or “analysis” to better describe the activity.
3.2 host
entity that receives feedback from a reviewer (3.3) as part of a peer review (3.1)
Note 1 to entry: The entity may be an organization, partnership, community, city, region, country or other body.
4.2 Decide the level of administration to be peer reviewed
Peer reviews can be an effective approach to reflect on the activities being conducted at any level of administration. The host should decide whether the peer review should focus on the national, regional, local or organizational levels. More than one level of administration may be the focus of the peer review, in which case, the amount of time available for the peer review should be increased to reflect the added complexity.